ISS023-E-48276
NASA Photo ID | ISS023-E-48276 |
Focal Length | 390mm |
Date taken | 2010.05.21 |
Time taken | 19:49:22 GMT |
Resolutions offered for this image:
1000 x 686 pixels 1000 x 686 pixels 3024 x 2016 pixels 720 x 480 pixels 6048 x 4147 pixels 640 x 439 pixels
1000 x 686 pixels 1000 x 686 pixels 3024 x 2016 pixels 720 x 480 pixels 6048 x 4147 pixels 640 x 439 pixels
Country or Geographic Name: | USA-HAWAII |
Features: | KILAUEA, LAVA FLOWS, VOLCANIC PLUME |
Features Found Using Machine Learning: | |
Cloud Cover Percentage: | 25 (11-25)% |
Sun Elevation Angle: | 55° |
Sun Azimuth: | 81° |
Camera: | Nikon D3X Electronic Still Camera |
Focal Length: | 390mm |
Camera Tilt: | 18 degrees |
Format: | 6048E: 6048 x 4032 pixel CMOS sensor, 35.9mm x 24.0mm, total pixels: 25.72 million, Nikon FX format |
Film Exposure: | |
Additional Information | |
Width | Height | Annotated | Cropped | Purpose | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1000 pixels | 686 pixels | No | No | Earth From Space collection | Download Image |
1000 pixels | 686 pixels | Yes | No | Earth From Space collection | Download Image |
3024 pixels | 2016 pixels | No | No | NASA's Earth Observatory web site | Download Image |
720 pixels | 480 pixels | Yes | No | NASA's Earth Observatory web site | Download Image |
6048 pixels | 4147 pixels | No | No | Download Image | |
640 pixels | 439 pixels | No | No | Download Image |
Download Packaged File
Download a Google Earth KML for this Image
View photo footprint information
Download a GeoTIFF for this photo
Image Caption: Planetary Exploration on Earth
In early June 2015, a team of scientists, an astronaut, and journalism students conducted geological traverses as an analog for future human exploration activity on a planetary surface like the moon or Mars. The area chosen for this analog study was the stark, other-worldly landscape of the 1974 lava flow along the southwestern rift of Kilauea, in the Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. The field site is located within the rain shadow west of the summit of Kilauea, allowing for better weather, little vegetation, and well-exposed volcanic features. The prevailing winds blow Kilauea's plume over the area, a constant threat to field work.
The team made observations, tested and collected data from a variety of field instruments. A prime objective of the field work was to document operational parameters associated with conducting geological traverses. The activity was sponsored by NASA's Solar System Exploration Virtual Institute (SSERVI) and conducted by the team called Remote, In Situ and Synchrotron Studies for Science and Education (RIS4E),
Questions asked by the team included: how long did the "crew" (2 scientists and an astronaut) take to assess the geology of a designated site? For key features identified by the crew for further data collection, how well did the field instruments operate? -- how useful were the data? -- and how much time was invested in collecting and interpreting the data? Finally, can the data and observations be integrated together to determine the best samples to bring back home to Earth for more detailed scientific study, and to tell the geologic story of the site?
In early June 2015, a team of scientists, an astronaut, and journalism students conducted geological traverses as an analog for future human exploration activity on a planetary surface like the moon or Mars. The area chosen for this analog study was the stark, other-worldly landscape of the 1974 lava flow along the southwestern rift of Kilauea, in the Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. The field site is located within the rain shadow west of the summit of Kilauea, allowing for better weather, little vegetation, and well-exposed volcanic features. The prevailing winds blow Kilauea's plume over the area, a constant threat to field work.
The team made observations, tested and collected data from a variety of field instruments. A prime objective of the field work was to document operational parameters associated with conducting geological traverses. The activity was sponsored by NASA's Solar System Exploration Virtual Institute (SSERVI) and conducted by the team called Remote, In Situ and Synchrotron Studies for Science and Education (RIS4E),
Questions asked by the team included: how long did the "crew" (2 scientists and an astronaut) take to assess the geology of a designated site? For key features identified by the crew for further data collection, how well did the field instruments operate? -- how useful were the data? -- and how much time was invested in collecting and interpreting the data? Finally, can the data and observations be integrated together to determine the best samples to bring back home to Earth for more detailed scientific study, and to tell the geologic story of the site?