Robinson, J. A., D. A. Liddle, C. A. Evans, and D. L. Amsbury. 2002. Astronaut-acquired orbital photographs as digital data for remote sensing: spatial resolution. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(20):4403-4438.


Astronaut-acquired Orbital Photographs as Digital Data for Remote Sensing: Spatial Resolution

Click here for the PDF version


MenuAbstract:
Astronaut-acquired orbital photographs (astronaut photographs) are a useful complement to images taken by orbiting satellites. They are in the public domain, and have been particularly useful for scientists in developing countries, as supplementary low-cloud data, and for studies requiring large numbers of images. Depending on camera, lens and look angle, digitised astronaut photographs can have pixel sizes representing areas on the Earth as small as 10 m or less, although most photographs suitable for digital remote sensing have pixel sizes between 30 and 60 m. Our objective is to provide a practical reference for scientists in a variety of disciplines who want to use astronaut photographs as remote sensing data. We detail the characteristics of astronaut photography systems that influence spatial resolution and summarise previous image acquisitions relative to these elements. We present methods for estimating ground coverage under three different levels of assumptions, to meet accuracy needs of different users. Of the more than 375,000 photographs taken to date, at least half have the potential to be used as a source of digital remote sensing data.

1. Introduction

1.1. Overview of NASA Astronaut Photography
     Astronaut photography of Earth is produced and archived by the National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA) and provides an important record of the state of the Earth that has not been used to its potential (e.g. Lulla et al. 1996). The practice was the foundation for the development of other forms of orbital remote sensing (Lowman 1999). Although the geometry is more complex than that of a vertical aerial photograph, astronaut photographs still provide information that can be interpreted by knowledgeable observers (Ring and Eyre 1983, Lowman 1985, Rasher and Weaver 1990, Drury 1993, Campbell 1996:121-156, Arnold 1997).

     Official NASA campaigns of terrain, ocean, and atmospheric photography were carried out during the Gemini missions (Underwood 1967, Lowman and Tiedemann 1971), the Earth-orbiting Apollo missions (Colwell 1971), the Apollo-Soyuz mission (El-Baz 1977, El-Baz and Warner 1979), Skylab (NASA 1974, Wilmarth et al. 1977,), a few Shuttle missions (e.g. the two Space Radar Laboratory missions of 1994, Jones et al. 1996), and the Shuttle-Mir missions (Evans et al. 2000). Extensive training in photography is available to members of all flight crews, during their general training period and during intensive training for specific missions (Jones et al. 1996). Most photographs have been taken by astronauts on a time-available basis. Astronaut photographs are thus a subset of the potential scenes, selected both by opportunity (orbital parameters, lighting, and crew workloads and schedules) and by the training, experience, and interest of the photographers.

     As remote sensing and geographic information systems have become more widely available tools, we have collaborated with a number of scientists interested in using astronaut photography for quantitative remote sensing applications. Digitised images from film are suitable for geometric rectification and image enhancement followed by classification and other remote sensing techniques (e.g. Lulla and Helfert 1989, Mohler et al. 1989, Helfert et al. 1990, Lulla et al. 1991, Eckardt et al. 2000, Robinson et al. 2000a, c, in press, Webb et al. in press). Because the photographs are in the public domain, they provide a low-cost alternative data source for cases where commercial imagery cannot be acquired. Such cases often include studies in developing countries, in areas that have not usually been targets for major satellites, needing supplemental low-cloud data, requiring a time series, or requiring a large number of images.

1.2. Extent of the Dataset
     As of 30 September 1999, 378,461 frames were included in the photograph database (Office of Earth Sciences 2000) comprising 99 missions from Mercury 3 (21 July 1961) through STS-96 (27 may through 6 June 1999). We reviewed the database, removing photographs that were deemed unsuitable for remote sensing analysis because they were not Earth-looking (no entry for tilt angle), had no estimated focal length, were over- or underexposed, or were taken at oblique tilt angles (further discussion of these characteristics follows). The remaining 190,911 frames (50.4% of the records present in the database) represent photographs that are potentially suitable for use as remote sensing data. As the database is always having new photography added, statistics can be updated on request using the web link 'Summary of Database Contents' at the Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (Office of Earth Sciences 2000).

1.3. Objectives
     The overall purpose of this paper is to provide understanding of the properties of astronaut-acquired orbital photographs to help scientists evaluate their applicability for digital remote sensing. Previous general descriptions of astronaut photography have been much less extensive and have tended to focus on numbers of photographs taken and geographic coverage, and emphasised interpretative applications (e.g. Helfert and Wood 1989, Lulla et al. 1993, 1994, 1996). By providing a unique compilation of the background information necessary to extend the use of astronaut photography beyond interpretation to rigorous analysis, we hope to provide a resource for scientists who could use this data in a variety of disciplines. In keeping with a potential interdisciplinary audience, we have tried to provide sufficient background information for scientists who do not have extensive training in remote sensing.

     We focus on spatial resolution because it is one of the most important factors determining the suitability of an image for a remote sensing objective. In remote sensing literature, spatial resolution for aerial photography is often treated very differently than spatial resolution of multispectral scanning sensors. To provide sufficient background for a discussion of spatial resolution for a data source that shares properties with both aerial photography and satellite remote sensing, we first summarise the ways that spatial resolution is typically quantified for aerial photography and satellite remote sensors.

     Given this background information, we (1) describe and illustrate factors that influence the spatial resolution of astronaut photographs, (2) show examples of estimating spatial resolution for a variety of photographs in a way that will enable users to make these calculations whether or not they have a background in photogrammetry, and (3) compare spatial resolution of digital data extracted from astronaut photographs to data obtained from other satellites.

Next >>

Introduction Background Factors that determine the footprint Other characteristics that influence spatial resolution Estimating spatial resolution of astronaut photographs Summary and Conclusions One of our servers is down, causing Image Detective and requesting of original imagery to not work, as well as causing photos database queries to take longer than usual.